Updating table with values from another table Kannada sex xxx

from sql.unitedstates;/* use this code to generate output so you don't overwrite the sql.unitedstates table */ options ls=84; proc sql outobs=10; title 'UNITEDSTATES'; create table work.unitedstates as select * from sql.unitedstates; update work.unitedstates as u set population=(select population from sql.newpop as n where u.name=n.state) where in (select state from sql.newpop); select Name format=., Capital format=., Population, Area, Continent format=., Statehood format=date9. UNITEDSTATES table, the in-line view in the SET clause returns a single value. NEWPOP, this value is the value of the Population column from SQL. For rows that do not have a corresponding row in SQL. In both cases, the returned value is assigned to the Population column.

from work.unitedstates ; The UPDATE statement updates values in the SQL. The WHERE clause ensures that only the rows in SQL. NEWPOP are updated, by checking each value of Name against the list of state names that is returned from the in-line view.

I put a primary key on B(id) because if there is NO SUCH constraint -- the update is totally ambigous -- if there is more then 1 value of B1 in B for a given ID -- we cannot tell what row in B should be used to update the row in A. REGISTRATION where BIN NOT IN (select BIN from VIS. Its working very nicely.i will greateful to u forever.i was suffering by this problem for a long i am using the following / insert into VISTEMP. i could envision problems with only a second of granularity on a clock -- you could miss a record or two due to that. d) I don't program forms -- you can try otn.- Thank u very much for ur nice reply. I plan to use RTRIM function in the WHERE clause to get specific set records and then after fetching, I’ll insert with a RTRIM on each column.

Given that, we can: [email protected] select * from a 2 / ID A1 ---------- ------------------------- 1 Hello 2 World The following updates are equivalent as well - they do the same thing differently. REGISTRATION); RUN and Computer in BIG Busy mood(Hang). REGISTRATION(BIN, NAME, NAME_ALIAS, COR_GROUP, AUTHOBY, AUTHODATE, CG_NAME, ADD1, ADD2, ADD3, TEL1, FAX1, ADD5, ADD6, ADD7, TEL2, FAX2, ADD9, ADD10, ADD11, TEL3, FAX3, TP_TYPE, TRD_LINC, TRD_FY, TRD_AUTH, IMP_REG, EXP_REG, REG_TYPE, TIN, STATUS, PRE_BIN, DATREG, STAT_CHNG, ACT_CODE, ACT_MULT, ITEM_TYPE, OLD_ACT, APP_CAT, LCODE, ISSUE_DATE, VREG, M_POSI, MFUNC, SFUNC, LAST_USER, LAST_ACCS, TREG, PAY_FREQ, CREG, EREG, OREG, OP_BAL, OP_BAL_DT)select BIN, NAME, NAME_ALIAS,---- from VIS. In update portion i am facing another problem by ur recomended code. INSERT into abc values (RTRIM(col1), RTRIM(col2) .) There is another option where I can use SELECT RTRIM(col1), RTRIM(col2) from xxx where RTRIM(col1) = ‘yyy’ and then directly use insert into target table without RTRIM.

But I am trapped by the method that without using cursor to achieve it. I have another table B containg 10,000 records of incremented and edited records of A table. I am using the following codes to append data from B to A. Normally, I would try to use a single sql statment -- here, due to the "data being spread all over the place", and being distributed and all. We have a 2 CPU machine where at normal times, the topmost entry in top command shows only .2 or .3 percentage of CPU use. This is on a test database where nothing else is going on concurrently.

There are one column in each table, call id, to link them. --For incremental/New data----- insert into A select * from B where column_name NOT IN (select column_name from B); --For Edited Data------- cursore C_AB select * from B minus select * from A For R in C_AB loop Update A set....where ... this shows how I would approach getting the first two columns -- just add the other 2 and use merge to keep filling temp -- and then update the join: [email protected] -1 5 group by urefitem ) b 6 on (temp.urefitem = b.urefitem) 7 when matched then update set amount = b.sum_total 8 when not matched then insert (urefitem,amount) values ( b.urefitem, b.sum_total) 9 / 398 rows merged. using a cursor means you are back to "slow=very_true" you already WERE updating on a bulk basis??? But when I run the following query, it takes up 50% of CPU. tab A has these columns: id, cycle, pop tab B has these columns: id, cycle, site_id,rel_cd,groupid update tab A a set pop= (select count(*) from tab B b where b.id=and a.cycle = b.cycle and b.site_id=44 and b.rel_cd in('code1','code2','code3') and b.groupid='123') where pop is null and id in(select id from tab B); call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 Execute 2 496.35 499.54 7530955 9902630 76532 11444 Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- total 3 496.35 499.54 7530955 9902630 76532 11444 Misses in library cache during parse: 0 Optimizer goal: CHOOSE Parsing user id: 305 Rows Row Source Operation ------- --------------------------------------------------- 1 UPDATE tab A 11445 MERGE JOIN 5942 VIEW VW_NSO_1 5942 SORT UNIQUE 31227 TABLE ACCESS FULL tab B 17385 SORT JOIN 12601 TABLE ACCESS FULL tab A Now my questions are: 1. We have several such updates that creates the same problems on the server from time to time and I would appreciate some guidance to resolve this.

Without the WHERE clause, rows that do not have a corresponding row in SQL.

NEWPOP would have their Population values updated to missing.

That gives me the all too familiar "[Macromedia][Seque Link JDBC Driver][ODBC Socket][Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Operation must use an updateable query. I might just have to query the topics, and stick an update query in the Do they ever? I think that article is how to do it in the Access desktop app, which I have no clue whatsoever how to use. This may seem like a simple question: Update Column a1 in Table A with all data in Column b1 in Table B. I have a table named A containing say 100000 records. HSCODELIST 5 WHERE not exists 6 (SELECT NULL FROM VIStemp. Brao what I suggest then is not to do it in a single sql statement -- just proving that "there are exceptions to every rule". Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------- BIN VARCHAR2(10) ACT_SL VARCHAR2(3) ACT_CODE VARCHAR2(11) ACT_VAL NUMBER(14,2) ENTRY_DATE DATE SQL DESC VIS. Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------- BIN VARCHAR2(10) ACT_SL VARCHAR2(3) ACT_CODE VARCHAR2(11) ACT_VAL NUMBER(14,2) ENTRY_DATE DATE SQL UPDATE (SELECT DBHSCODELIST. the database needs to know that each row in dbhscodelist will map to AT MOST one row in hscodelist - this mandates a primary or unqiue key constraint on the join columns this is discussed in the original answer above.In Microsoft Access 2007, I'm trying to update about 6000 records from one table with values from another table, but I'm having problems. When you have finished adding your tables, click on the Close button.Actually I am trying to update the Bot table MFG with the Big table MFG when Big. In this example, we've selected the Big and Bot tables.

Search for updating table with values from another table:

updating table with values from another table-45updating table with values from another table-62updating table with values from another table-77updating table with values from another table-41

I am think of the way without using cursor, script as below. I don't understand what's the problem.i am going to give u full overview of my problem. The software is available in different portion of the country for data entry and report generation etc. What about: create global temporary table gtt ( id int primary key, cnt int ) on commit delete rows / you'll add that ONCE, it'll become part of your schema forever....

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “updating table with values from another table”

  1. And if you haven’t discovered this yet, it will be at these moments that you discover one of the necessities of modern relationships is to remain undisturbed when it does happen.