Sci fi speed dating facebook 2together dating agency
Besides, even if you argue that the development of the nuclear bomb sin, I still reply that it wasn't the first sin.
The mistrust of science itself antedates the nuclear bomb.
Understand that the angry reactionaries are not just hicks rubes living in the sticks.
Many of them are very rich and sophisticated people who happen to be buggy-whip magnates and are upset that the basis of their wealth just evaporated.
Science was going to bring us to a grand and glorious Utopian future. Science unleashed unspeakable horrors, there were things man was not meant to know, and one started to see more and more dystopias in science fiction literature. But at exactly which point in time did the disillusionment with the "goodness" of science come? Could it have come at the time when some scientist or scientists demonstrated the evil in science beyond any doubt; showed mankind a vision of evil so intense that not only the scientist himself but all of science was darkened past the point where it could be washed clean again?
Even now there is some nostalgia for this view, the technical term is "Retro-Futurism". When was the sin of the scientist committed, then, and who was the scientist? It was to that which Oppenheimer referred in his remark on sin. The nuclear bomb is a terrible thing that has contributed immeasurably to the insecurity of mankind and to his growing distrust of science, but the nuclear bomb is by no means pure evil.
That bomb intensified the mistrust but did not originate it.
I find a certain significance in the fact that the play , published a century earlier, in 1818, was the last thrust of theological, rather than scientific, sin.
Why should men be so ready, in 1921, to think that science could get out of hand and do total evil to the human race, when only a few years before, science was still the "Mr. World War II was a greater and deadlier war than World War I; but World War I was incomparably more stupid in its details.
But things really shifted into high gear with the Industrial Revolution.
Technology started industrializing the United States around 1790, changing it from an agricultural society into a manufacturing society.
Jerry Pournelle predicted that in the far future people could use something like an internet to find answers to their questions, but failed to predict that people would be angry if the answer took longer than three seconds to appear (drat that Google is slow today).
There are even jobs that did not exist a couple of decades ago (Search engine optimization expert? I believe that master science fiction author and science explainer Isaac Asimov has the answer.